This is an electronic reprint of an article that appeared in Underwater USA
(Oct. 1993, p. 35). This material is copyrighted and all rights are retained
by the author. This material is made available as a service to the diving
community by the author and may be distributed for any non-commercial or
Not-For-Profit use.
There is within our sport diving community a disturbing trend to
overweight. We are propagating a generation of divers who actually believe
the myth that it is necessary to grossly overweight in order to go diving.
That myth is simply not true. Dan Orr, Training Coordinator for D.A.N., has
interviewed and photographed hundreds of divers in preparation for his slide
presentation "Dressed To Kill." His findings indicate that "overweighting is
a problem that knows no boundaries in experience or certification level."
Dan's slide presentation contains numerous "candid" photos of divers who
have gone to great (and often bizarre) measures to accomplish this
overweighting. Such extremes include, but are not limited to strapping large
hip weights on scuba cylinders with duct tape or using multiple ankle
weights including chains. Although the problem is most easily recognized on
the basic check-out, this problem with overweighting appears throughout our
diving community.
One of the genuine pleasures of diving is to glide weightlessly through
the water environment. With time a diver develops a sense of oneness of
self and Planet Ocean. It is this freedom from gravity that is, in part,
responsible for that very real "divers high." Overweighted divers are not
free from the constraints of gravity and thus deny themselves great joy.
Diving weightless is fun. Crashing into (and destroying) our reefs and/or
disturbing everyone's visibility by mucking around on the bottom because of
overweighting is not fun; it is work! Let's examine and hopefully destroy
this myth "that overweighting is O.K. because you can add air to your B.C."
Simply put: Work is the movement of mass through distance. If you carry
more weight, you move more mass through the water; thus you will do more
work. More work means more air consumed and less bottom time. If you
compensate for the extra weight by adding air to the B.C. you increase your
drag in the water; thus you do even more work. The overweighted diver
generally adds a lot of air to the B.C. As the diver moves, the air shifts
and such divers often feel like they are moving around out of control.
(They, of course, are out of control.) The added air poses an additional
problem on ascent. The air rapidly expands and increases a diver's ascent
rate. An efficient diver tries to minimize work done by streamlining his
body; thus an efficient diver moves horizontally through the water. An
overweighted diver generally moves through the water with head higher than
feet. This position presents a larger cross-sectional area and creates a lot
of drag. Again, the diver must do more work. In this position most of the
thrust from the fin is wasted trying to stay level in the water column and
forward movement is not as much as it should be. Again, more needless energy
is expended. Finally, the extra weight puts a strain on the back and
increases risk of diver injury. Bottom line: If you overweight, then you
will overwork.
The fundamental principle involved in weighting was described
historically by the Greek philosopher Archimedes. He discovered that an
object will be subject to a buoyant upward force equal to the weight of the
water displaced by the object. This means that if an object immersed is more
dense than water (more mass than an equal volume of water), then the object
will sink. If the object immersed is lighter, the object will float and
weight must be added for the object to sink. Most human beings have a
density than is nearly the same as water. (No big deal, we are composed
primarily of water.) Lean muscle tissue is more dense than water; it sinks.
Fat floats.
There are two primary sources of positively buoyant forces that enter
the water with the diver. They are fat tissue and air spaces. The fat
problem can be addressed by proper diet, exercise and lifestyle
modifications. The air space problem can be addressed by merely taking time
to evaluate the situation.
The primary source of positive buoyancy lies in the wet suit. The foam
rubber material uses trapped air for insulation. This volume of air must be
compensated for by the addition of weight. Except for purchasing a dry suit
that does not change buoyancy at depth, there is very little a diver can do
to change this factor. The diver becomes more negative at depth because the
water pressure decreases the volume of the trapped air in the suit and this
reduces buoyancy of the suit.
Divers are people. People do not breathe water. As you enter the
water, your primitive brain reminds you that you do not breathe water and
you tend to inhale and hold larger volumes of air. For this illustration
consider the lungs to be like a Mae West jacket: as you inhale, you inflate
your "life preserver" and descent becomes more difficult." This is
particularly noticeable in new divers. Doing surface dives and floundering
around kicking with fins in the air does nothing but burn air, tire divers
and increase frustration. Jerry Ashe, NAUI instructor and Florida dive
guide, states, "most visiting divers have no concept of how much weight they
should be wearing to achieve neutral buoyancy." "Too many divers," he says,
"simply put extra weight on to get underwater, instead of learning to
relax." The best way to descend is to simply relax. This allows lung volume
to be normal. If properly weighted (see below), descent is initiated by
simply exhaling. Many of the early difficulties in descent can be solved by
just spending a few minutes at the surface relaxing. (I have seen divers
remove more than eight lbs of lead when shown how to relax.)
Many divers who have descent problems have failed to drain all of the
air out of their B.C.'s. Some inexpensive bladder stabilizing vests actually
trap large volumes of air. This is not a problem with higher quality
jackets. If you are having problems descending, it might be wise to have a
buddy look at your jacket to determine if large air volumes are being
trapped between the bladder and the outer covering. This is the type of
situation that is easily solved: Throw money at the problem (buy a better
quality jacket) and the problem disappears. Often divers do not actually
vent all of the air from their B.C. Divers should examine their own
individual gear and assume a descent position that places the B.C. vent at
the highest possible point. It is helpful to have a buddy/instructor examine
descent procedures to determine the optimum venting position. Descent in
this position allows the water pressure to push all of the air out of the
B.C. (I have seen divers remove 10 lbs of lead, or more, when they were
shown how to properly vent their B.C.'s.)
For a 1/4" farmer john wet suit in fresh water, I use the following
procedure to establish proper weighting. Start with 10% of your body weight
on your weight belt. Inflate your B.C. and enter water just slightly
deeper than your height WITH A NEARLY EMPTY TANK! (About 500 psig). Assume a
vertical position in the water. Take a few moments to relax. Put the
regulator in your mouth and breathe normally. Vent your B.C. Your dive
buddy/instructor can verify that your B.C. is empty. You should float at eye
level. You should sink as you exhale and rise as you inhale. If you cannot
sink below eye level, add weight in 2 pound increments until you can float
at eye level. If you sink below eye level, then remove weight in 2-4 pound
increments. Since your buoyancy is set with an empty tank, there will be no
problem at the end of your dive in shallow water or holding a 10 foot stop
because of buoyancy changes caused by the consumption of air. A full tank
will be a few pounds heavier than an empty tank, thus you will initially
enter the water slightly negative. Initial descent is then a matter of
venting the B.C. and exhaling. This procedure should be done with each
change in equipment configuration. The mark of a good diver is the ability
to dive with a minimum of weight.
Divers should realize that buoyancy is an individual matter that
depends on a number of variables. Lee Somers, Ph.D., Diving Safety Officer
for the University of Michigan, in his booklet, Buoyancy and the ScubaDiver,
reminds divers that their buoyancy changes with size (weight
gain/loss), body composition (%fat), lung capacity, breathing volume,
psychological state (relaxed vs. tense), and exercise load. As these
variables change, so will the amount of weight necessary to achieve neutral
buoyancy. Since buoyancy changes with time and experience, divers should
get in the habit of routinely checking their personal buoyancy requirements.
The weights on the belt should be balanced, ie. left and right sides
should be equal so that the diver does not roll to one side because of more
weight on one side or the other. Have your dive buddy look at your belt to
verify that the weight is evenly distributed. The weight should be as far
forward as possible on the belt. No weight should be on the back part of
the belt underneath the scuba cylinder. (This minimizes strain on the back
and shifts the center of buoyancy closer to the center of mass. Translation:
You will be more stable in the water with less tendency to roll. You will be
able to remain stationary on the surface without rolling to one side.)
Finally, eliminating the weight underneath the scuba cylinder makes the belt
much easier to ditch in an emergency.
The ability to control buoyancy is a fundamental skill. Divers who
cannot master this skill will be working too hard to ever really enjoy the
absolutely fantastic "wonderfulness" of gliding weightless through Planet
Ocean. Lou Fead, the EASY DIVER, said it best, "Dive with your brains, not
your back!" If you remember that B.C.'s are not weight belt compensating
devices, then you will work less and enjoy diving more.
Larry "Harris" Taylor, Ph.D. is a biochemist and scuba instructor at the University of Michigan.
He has authored more than 100 scuba related articles. His personal dive library (See Alert Diver,
Mar/Apr, 1997, p. 54) is considered by many as one of the best recreational sources of information
In North America.